Ahhhh. So, in the end, the puzzle is just about the "hard solution vs. easy solution" in the puzzle. It's like when you're looking for your phone but it's in your hand.

I already solve it. but thank you for explaination :).

this is already raised there

you must return the address of the initial byte of reversed, not of the last byte. in other words you should return the same address that you were initially passed.

you are supposed to write to the output parameter reversed and to return it, instead of allocating your own

the reverced char pointer is pass from last byte in the array or first while I see that reverced = '\0' wich mean this kata give you reverced at last pos in arr of char

is not about that this kata have a problem but it need more test case even it review by experienced coders. that make anyone "coder" work the brain and they logic.

Pretty fun kata, it really encourages you to analyze the results

There is no maybe here. This particular kata has been reviewed many times by a lot of experienced coders, and their agreement is that it does work correctly.

maybe!

It's like that on purpose. It's not an issue.

hi, this kata not have attemps test "more test" it can any one use my code to valid this kata.
and sorry for not explain more the issue.

This kata issue posting needs more work!

You have not explained any problem whatsoever, so there is no way to follow up on your comment.

Closing.

this kata need more work!

Not your fault. The problem is written wrong. The first statement says to put them in reverse. The second statement says to re-arrange to get the biggest number.