Approve my fork,
Description merge conflict :-(
I didn't translate it, I just updated the original one to be of better quality :)
Are you sure a class is needed? A simple function won't do? The python version uses a function, but you probably translated it from another language.
Also, it may be better to calculate the expected result before the test, otherwise it may be vulnerable to input manipulation.
Needs random tests.
Sample tests: line.new.tickets????
Fair point Voile, I didn't think about how small the sequence is, just thought it would add an interesting extra layer of complexity to the existing upside-down integers kata. Oh well, live and learn.
I love the idea of this kata, but I really felt your README let it down. It wasn't at all clear what methods the ORM is expected to make available.
The fact that records should only be saved to the 'database' when an explicit save message is sent, and not on instantiation, is pretty counter-intuitive.
=> sure that far enough of any of those to not be a duplicate?
Done => no, that's way too close from the other upside-down katas.
please unpublish it.
No problem! Glad it makes more sense now.
Nice. Definitely an improvement in my opinion. Also, apologies for flagging this as an 'ISSUE', I didn't mean to!
I tried rewording the prompt to make it less confusing, and I hope it helps. If anything is still unclear, just let me know, and I'll try to clarify it further. Good luck!
This may well just be my less-than-stellar grasp of mathematics but I, personally, found the instructions a little confusing. Just FYI.
Ok, I've added some random tests. Thanks again for the advice :)
already raised, my dear... ;/