python:

input: '{5131690 ,q, 8385903 , 4 , 16663 , 18007 -> 49156109 29449627 837181 PuLPnQXRX RnxAT 5771 TzK } (9dipjokNPfJuC , U5TYfE)'

output ''

wait: '(5131690,q,8385903,4,16663,18007){49156109;29449627;837181;PuLPnQXRX;RnxAT;5771;TzK;}(9dipjokNPfJuC,U5TYfE)'

but we have 9dipjokNPfJuC (The definition of names is quite similiar to C/Java. Names like this are invalid: 1a)

It works up to 99 only.

This isn't the best solution and it works up to 99.

Damn, I didn't know they equal whatever the order in those. What a shame

nice and elegant

Approved

Thank you, done

Looks great! I'd just suggest moving rnd50, fizzBuzzArray, and check into the Describe struct & within a private section, like how this example does it

Thanks, noted.

The actual core logic in these tests is quite good, but the code violates a couple of the Codewars C++ authoring guidelines. Giving that page a good skim is important, and I've linked the relevant section beside each note below.

• Every snippet should #include all the header files it needs at the top (ex: the submission test cases should include <random>, <string>, <vector>, and <algorithm> for std::min). Do not put #include in preloaded. (Docs - § Header files)
• unsigned is a more appropriate type for f and b since they will never be negative, and std::size_t (from <cstddef>) is a more appropriate type for size and i.
• The return type of reverseFizzBuzz should not be a std::vector but instead a structure with a fixed compile time size of 2 numbers (any of the following are valid: std::pair<unsigned, unsigned> from <utility> (the best fit imo), or std::tuple<unsigned, unsigned> from <tuple>, or std::array<unsigned, 2> from <array>, or a custom struct with two unsigneds). (Docs - § Code style).
• Missing feedback on test failure, via ExtraMessage. (Docs - § Example Test Suite)
• (Not an issue): All other current languages in this kata use heterogeneous arrays, but this version understandably treats everything as strings. I think this is a fine compromise, but I still would want to hear the opinion of another reviewer on whether this changes the spirit of the kata or not (again, I don't mind it).

C++ translation kumited :з