Tests should use python test framework: https://docs.codewars.com/languages/python/codewars-test

• missing import
• missing test.it blocks
• missing test.describe

In c++ it keeps failing with exit code 132, eventhough the tests seem to pass and the log is empty.
I tried to google exit code 132, but found nothing that seemed applicable to this situation.
Does anybody know what might be going on here?

NASM Translation

Expected: equal to [ ]

Actual: [

how can it be... other tests are ok

please, anyone, give me a hint

c++

A best practice when templating this kind of algorithm is to
make it generic, i.e. pass a range or [begin,end) as template parameters...
Indeed, the initial parameter says 'iterable' :-)
May also test with any kind of ordered iterable, so that one may use concepts one day and return {} if the values cannot be ordered ?

There's a few missing C# test cases

[Test]
public void NullSequence()
{
  Assert.That(Kata.UniqueInOrder(null), Throws.InstanceOf<ArgumentNullException>());
  // OR (undefined requirement)
  Assert.That(Kata.UniqueInOrder(null), Is.Empty)
}

[Test]
public void NullValue()
{
  // Breaks solutions that use default as a placeholder value
  Assert.That(Kata.UniqueInOrder(new string[]{"Hello", null, null, "world"}), Is.EqualTo(new string[]{"Hello", null, "world"}));
}

[Test]
public void LeadingZero()
{
  // Breaks solutions that use default as a placeholder value
  Assert.That(Kata.UniqueInOrder(new int[]{0, 1, 2, 3}), Is.EqualTo(new int[]{0, 1, 2, 3}));
}

[Test]
public void EmptyIntegerArray()
{
  // Breaks solutions that use default as a placeholder value
  Assert.That(Kata.UniqueInOrder(Array.Empty<int>()), Is.EqualTo(Array.Empty<int>()));
}

[Test]
public void MixedTypes()
{
  // Make sure solutions don't use assumptions between types
  Assert.That(Kata.UniqueInOrder(new object[]{1, "2", 2, 2, "5", "5"}), Is.EqualTo(new object[]{1, "2", 2, "5"}));
}

private class Foo
{
  public override bool Equals(object other) => other is Foo || other is Bar;
}

private class Bar
{
  public override bool Equals(object other) => other is Foo || other is Bar;
}

[Test]
public void RemovesDuplicateCustomTypes()
{
  // Make sure solutions don't use assumptions between types
  Assert.That(Kata.UniqueInOrder(new object[]{new Foo(), 1, new Bar(), new Foo(), string.Empty}).Select(res => res.GetType()), Is.EqualTo(new object[]{typeof(Foo), typeof(1), typeof(Bar), typeof(string)}));
}

I got confused for data types .....

like, example [1, 2, 3, 4, "4", 4, "4", "4"]

should it be [1, 2, 3, 4, "4", 4, "4"]

or

[1, 2, 3, 4]

??

I am using JavaScript.

The sample tests in crystal expect an array of strings whereas the random tests expect an array of characters

Ruby 3.0 should be enabled, see this to learn how to do it