• ###### dfhwzecommented on "[Code Golf] Spinning Wheels" javascript solution

The tests were incorrect, feel free to resubmit a slightly altered version of his.

• ###### dfhwzecommented on "Lunar Drilling Operation" javascript solution

You're not just a programmer, you're an artist :)

why

craazy

• ###### ShamanBlackoutcommented on "A self-descriptive fractal sequence" python solution

I tried to think of way to get mines in 1 line. Nice!

• ###### dfhwzecommented on "Where's Waldo?" javascript solution

within the spirit of the kata, haha!

• ###### t3l3f00ncommented on "Fibofamily #1" python solution

This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

• ###### goldenratio161commented on "Fibofamily #1" python solution

yes, we had to 'cheat' this way

• ###### t3l3f00ncommented on "Difference of perfect squares displayed as sum of consecutive odd numbers " javascript solution

Yes, but white highlighted syntax always grinds my gears.:) Imo, quite annoying it contains Array.:)

• ###### phildiniuscommented on "Difference of perfect squares displayed as sum of consecutive odd numbers " javascript solution

Fwiw, you could also get rid of the `let` to really golf it up. :)

• ###### justinburgesscommented on "ASCII Fun #1: X- Shape" javascript solution

Ah yes. I do remember life without children.

• ###### t3l3f00ncommented on "Territorial Disputes" python solution

Uh-oh.. time complexity is O(WxHxT) (width, height, #territories). I might have to review this strategy :)

• ###### tonylicodingcommented on "Territorial Disputes" python solution

What is the time complexity of this solution? If its O(NxM) (N=width,M-height), normally it should pass the tests since I changed max size for width and height to 400 now.

Nice! :)

• ###### juanignaciomalerb4commented on "Separating Strings" javascript solution

how this can be Best Practices?... i mean is clever for sure, but it is really dificult to read