Approved some time ago

As I warned the author 1.5 years ago, the API that we're supposed to use is now broken (tests time out before a response is received). Even if the whole get-data-from-an-external-website thing is removed, it's still a yet another groupby task which isn't novel at all. A moderator should unpublish this (and remove this kata from this list on github if possible).

Can't be changed anymore, future katas should keep this in mind ~~

Description cannot be approved, recent changes from related record must be merged first.

Approved by someone

Great kata!

Approved

what was your O?

Pozdrawiam rodaka :) Nie dziwie sie ze to kata rozwiazano tylko 129 razy w ciagu 5 lat :)
I greet my compatriot :) I'm not surprised this kata was solved only 129 times within 5 years :)

Hats off to all non-natives who solved it :)

you are welcome. please keep in mind that 1) infinitesimal is not absolute, and 2) for the future that you could adapt random testing to include all possible edge cases. in some kata, this is tricky, but then you can also create a sub-set of random tests for that purpose. best of luck

Now only shuffled strings are tested in the second test suite, and the number of tests is 100. Your solution gives erroneous result only when the string's first or last letter is the same as pattern's first/last letter. That's interesting and could be easily fixed (actually with 100 tests your solution has become obsolete, but infinitesimal chance remaines).

Yet it's pointless for me to continue working on it, as the kata has already been sunk by downvotes of high-ranking users. It will never get out of beta, given how many low-ranking users would have to vote it up and how rarely beta kata are completed. Anyway, thank you for your interesting solution, and have a good afternoon ..or whatever time of day it is in your timezone now, mine is afternoon:)

He means that returning 'FOUND' and 'NOT FOUND' brings nothing to the task of the kata itself.

my code passed this particular test, but the feedback is a hot mess. it says In is TWO things, including words shuffled... why? also, why am I seeing the last line: Result: FOUND , NOT FOUND, that's useless to me. Anyway, the point of me raising an issue here is not about feedback (I should have posted the code snippet above in an issue by FArekkusu), it's about the fact that my code got passed your testing. No solution should sometimes pass.

@rowcased I tried your solution several times and it failed only with a couple of right-wrong tests, but still failed. So you must have been lucky:) Nevertheless, I don't deny test cases should be improved