Draft

Fibonacci Finder

Description
Loading description...
  • Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
  • jacobb Avatar

    Aside from my prior comment, it seems like you're going to implement a more original version from what you've said. If you return to the Kata editor, you can unpublish the kata.

  • jacobb Avatar

    Your test cases fail due to referencing variables that are undefined.

    Also, several Fibonacci katas have been implemented. If you want to create a Fibonacci kata, please review the ones that have been created already and if you are able to, create one that has solutions unlike the other ones.

  • jhoffner Avatar

    Thanks for the contribution @morgantheplant. However we already have a number of Fibonacci kata and this challenge doesn't seem to provide anything unique from those.

    Maybe you can take a look at those and see if there is a new angle you can take that gives this challenge a little bit more separation from them.

    • morgantheplant Avatar

      Dang didn't realize there were already some Fibonacci kata. Anyways I will try a new angle when I get some free time.. thanks for checking it out!

  • Psychemaster Avatar

    Reference error: ten is undefined.

    Without knowing what ten is, this kata isn't submittable.

    Note: Reported as minor issue, don't have the required honour to report as major.

    • morgantheplant Avatar

      Yeah my bad, I should've read up on the documentation for the test framework. I don't think any of my tests are working. Anyways I've been told there are some similar Fibonacci kata already posted, so think I'm goign to change it entirely when I get some free time.

      Thanks for checking it out!!

  • Abbe Avatar

    Your tests won't run. They complain about ten being undefined.

    • JoshBrodieNZ Avatar

      Unless there is some very serious preloaded code, the tests make no sense at all. They are all similar to asserting that fiboNacci(21) is equal to twenty1.toString, or similarly arbitary number-related methods which the kata does not require us to define.

    • morgantheplant Avatar

      Yeah i crapped the bed on this.. I should've read the test framework, I got a little over zealous and posted w/o checking if it was all working correctly.

      Anyways I am goign to change it up entirely bc I've been told there are already some similar Fibonacci kata posted.

      Thanks @Abbe and @JoshBrodieNZ for checking it out!!