Draft
Fibonacci Finder
Loading description...
View
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Aside from my prior comment, it seems like you're going to implement a more original version from what you've said. If you return to the Kata editor, you can unpublish the kata.
Your test cases fail due to referencing variables that are undefined.
Also, several Fibonacci katas have been implemented. If you want to create a Fibonacci kata, please review the ones that have been created already and if you are able to, create one that has solutions unlike the other ones.
Thanks for the contribution @morgantheplant. However we already have a number of Fibonacci kata and this challenge doesn't seem to provide anything unique from those.
Maybe you can take a look at those and see if there is a new angle you can take that gives this challenge a little bit more separation from them.
Dang didn't realize there were already some Fibonacci kata. Anyways I will try a new angle when I get some free time.. thanks for checking it out!
Reference error:
ten
is undefined.Without knowing what
ten
is, this kata isn't submittable.Note: Reported as minor issue, don't have the required honour to report as major.
Yeah my bad, I should've read up on the documentation for the test framework. I don't think any of my tests are working. Anyways I've been told there are some similar Fibonacci kata already posted, so think I'm goign to change it entirely when I get some free time.
Thanks for checking it out!!
Your tests won't run. They complain about
ten
being undefined.Unless there is some very serious preloaded code, the tests make no sense at all. They are all similar to asserting that fiboNacci(21) is equal to twenty1.toString, or similarly arbitary number-related methods which the kata does not require us to define.
Yeah i crapped the bed on this.. I should've read the test framework, I got a little over zealous and posted w/o checking if it was all working correctly.
Anyways I am goign to change it up entirely bc I've been told there are already some similar Fibonacci kata posted.
Thanks @Abbe and @JoshBrodieNZ for checking it out!!