Beta
#1 Beat the Bookmaker
Loading description...
Probability
Mathematics
Statistics
Data Science
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Random tests are vulnerable to input modification.
Why literally every kata about bookmaker always has inadequate explanation about the whole subject?
I would like to know, in your example of the description, how to calculate
20%?And I don't know why its
[4/6, 6/4, 4/1]instead of['4-6', '6-4', '4-1']?4/6 is the same as 4-6, there are many ways of displaying odds. Here the 4/6 actualy resolves the odds. Something you need to consider in the Kata. The 20% is the 'bookmakers margin', I thin the description explains what that is. But do you think more clarity is needed?