7 kyu
Zalgo text reader
606 of 1,140buttonupbub
Loading description...
Regular Expressions
Fundamentals
View
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Ruby 3.0 should be enabled, read this to learn how to do it
Please organize the structure of test fixture as following (although it has been mentioned in the attached link, I'm repeated here again)
fixed
Well, the solutions are really cool.
I'd like to do more Unicode-based kata, as it's important if you want to work in Computational Linguistics
The error messages are completely terrifying!
Only the description was updated to say that the instead of
A-Za-z0-9.,!?
it simply expects ASCII characters. The random tests were not updated, so all the300150 existing solutions should work.You expect too much from a 7 kyu kata, I guess
Up until yesterday, it only had JS version with no random tests, so that pretty much means no tests at all. There were no checks if a character like ':' or any other was present, allowing almost any solution to pass. I wish the author was active, so it would've been his decision to make. It was my understanding that the kata is about extracting printable characters, so limiting it to a smaller subset of characters seemed weird. I don't think there's much harm done here...
With that said, I do agree with #2.
Even if it wasn't tested, most people followed the description. In either case, the tests should match the description because with the current description most of the solution voted as best practices are incorrect.
Do you suggest to revert this change?
I'm not sure. The change isn't ideal, but that specific character set was a bit strange in this context in the first place as well.
Ruby translation kumited, including slightly modified description -- please check and approve (note: author is inactive)
Interesting idea for a kata. Because it's solvable without actually needing to know anything about Zalgo explicitly (news to me), I suggest you challenge the solver upfront to NOT follow the links. This will make it more fun for some of the newer coders, and if they can't hack it, they can always fall back on the links.
Ruby translation (above, waiting approval) includes a less obvious reference in the description
Other characters aren't being tested. Either description needs to change to include all punctuation, or more thorough tests with special characters must be added.
Ruby translation (above) should remove this from the description, once it's approved
Snakey Snake Python translation.
🐍
Please review and approve.
approved
needs random tests
(interesting concept, btw, thx)
Note: might be good to not rely on the external links, about the description.