Draft
Is it fibonacci?
Loading description...
Fundamentals
Arrays
Mathematics
Algorithms
Lists
Data Structures
View
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Please unpublish it, or you'll receive more
downvotes
. :DYou should provide more test cases. On the other side, as others have pointed out, there are too many Fibonacci katas.
No random tests. Insufficient fixed tests. Disconventional function naming. Double of a thousand existing kata.
Not much satisfied, sorry. Please try again. (Please don't try to fix this kata. It's not worth it.)
Again the same... no new ideas? Marked it as issue... too many fibonacci katas...