Retired
Terrible Exception Handling (retired)
Loading description...
Fundamentals
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Why are there no sample tests?
This comment has been hidden.
Python 3.8 should be enabled.
welcome back to Codewars, real Farekkusu ! :):)
I might be overlooking the obvious solution to this, but I have a working solution using a Bdb debugger that eats my exceptions when I need it to. Works locally, but the tests return
Is this the author's doing? Or perhaps something related to CW's Python image?
Too bad, I'm at a loss as to how this can be solved without
with(except perhaps cheesing it and obfuscating thewithcall inside an exec call)Python 3.6 needs to be enabled.
It's not as simple as that. Everything fails for some reason when I change it to 3.6, and I don't know why. I've tried, though – does that work?
This comment has been hidden.
It's as simple as this: https://www.codewars.com/kumite/5e68f469024d8200285f08d7?sel=5e68f94d024d8200235ec927