7 kyu
Near or Far
127SeraphWedd
Loading description...
Arrays
Algorithms
Geometry
Mathematics
.avif)
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
This kata should be 6q
most users disagree, you can join beta process if you want to have your voice heard:
{ "data": [ { "rank": -7, "count": 21 }, { "rank": -6, "count": 9 }, { "rank": -5, "count": 3 }, { "rank": -8, "count": 2 }, { "rank": -4, "count": 1 } ] } ```
This comment has been hidden.
I'd recommend having some larger values of n and m in the test cases to avoid a brute force approach.
In the example in description: why (3,0) isn't in returned_values?
Sorry, my mistake, I probably forgot to check the example results. Thanks for pointing it out!
Such error messages are completely useless.
I tried modifying the error messge to include the target array length as clue. Is this fine?
All the preloaded stuff should be moved to fixture.
Pardon, since this is my first kata, I think I misunderstood that preloaded stuff isn't included in the whole code run time. Thanks for pointing it out. I moved it now to the Test Cases tab. Thanks.