Retired
Find the number of each letter (retired)
17Aminsay
Loading description...
Algorithms
Objects
Data Types
Fundamentals
Logic
Strings
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Duplicate
I really don't think there is a way to make this kata not a duplicate. Counting elements and returning an object has been done to death. Mapping and filtering elements won't help; the essential task is a duplicate, tacking on unrelated tasks ( that have also been done to death ) is not going to make it better.
Just unpublish it, come up with an original idea ( which is going to be hard! Sorry, but going on
10 000kata have already been published .. ), and make that into a kata.In any case, please, let go of the idea "I can publish a kata, so I must"; ask yourself not "What can CodeWars do for me?" but "What can I do for CodeWars?". Your motivation for publishing a kata should be what it adds to CodeWars, not what it adds to your profile.
Duplicate.
Thx, made more unique.