Kata

Hi! Thank you so much for telling!! I have tried to adjust the random input generation and it seems to be okay now. And thank you for telling about random.choices, I didn't know there is such a convenient way of generating strings!! I changed it to use random.choices! Can I also ask you about passing the deep copy of the input? So as long as I call the user's function after computing the expected output it is fine but then do we need to pass a deep copy for the fixed tests or this is also fine?

I didn't notice about the fixed tests. You don't need the deep copy there either, yes.

About the random generator, I have to say... I'm worried about these conditions: if current_depth != 1:. Why? Strings should appear anywhere in the structure, whatever the depth.

Thank you for explaining about fixed tests! As for that condition, I made it like that because initial idea was that the main list have lists and those lists have either strings or other lists and I noted that in the rules. I was actually also thinking that it would probably make more sense to switch it so just strings anywhere but something stopped me from doing it. I quickly tested my solution with the strings in the depth 0 just now and it seemed okay, so if everything goes fine, I will change it tomorrow to include them as you advised! Thank you!!

Hi! I am sorry, I will have to put it off until tomorrow, I wanted to do it this evening, but I have a strong headache and feel like a vegetable. I remember about the promise and will definitely do it.

there's no hurry, don't worry.

Thank you!! I have just updated the spec and all of the tests to include strings in the shallowest 0 depth. It looks now so much better with them ! :]