5 kyu
JS is Weird: Return fuelstar
225PG1
Loading description...
Strings
Fundamentals
This comment has been reported as {{ abuseKindText }}.
Show
This comment has been hidden. You can view it now .
This comment can not be viewed.
- |
- Reply
- Edit
- View Solution
- Expand 1 Reply Expand {{ comments?.length }} replies
- Collapse
- Spoiler
- Remove
- Remove comment & replies
- Report
{{ fetchSolutionsError }}
-
-
Your rendered github-flavored markdown will appear here.
-
Label this discussion...
-
No Label
Keep the comment unlabeled if none of the below applies.
-
Issue
Use the issue label when reporting problems with the kata.
Be sure to explain the problem clearly and include the steps to reproduce. -
Suggestion
Use the suggestion label if you have feedback on how this kata can be improved.
-
Question
Use the question label if you have questions and/or need help solving the kata.
Don't forget to mention the language you're using, and mark as having spoiler if you include your solution.
-
No Label
- Cancel
Commenting is not allowed on this discussion
You cannot view this solution
There is no solution to show
Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Updated
It is possible to cheat.
Fixed
"Lowest assessed rank: 7kyu" :')
It's ready for approval, perhaps someone can do - i'm "curious" about the ranking;-)?!
Me too...
before approval it'd be nice to know what this kata is teaching that the other kata didn't.
Easy to answer:-): Finding (!!) and adding (!) single letters to a given word;-)...
I've seen that in solutions in the previous kata so I believe it must already be known to pass the original one.
No volunteers here...? Steffen, Myjinxin, ... small step for you, great step for the community:-)...
It just seems there's no new knowledge you need to have to pass this kata..
for example if you had one kata which asks for a short number then another kata asking for an even longer number, there's nothing new you have to do just add more numbers.
Yes;-)... surely you are right, only a little bit more typing (by the way my vote was 7, because 3/4 seems much too high:-))...
I believe it should be ranked about a 6 and the previous kata should have probably been ranked the same because I don't believe it doesn't meet any of these requirements.
So it's your time to approve it as 6kyu - same as the first one;-)...
I would but I don't think this kata should be approved, I won't try stop it just thought it's a good discussion point as well.
basically a duplicate of https://www.codewars.com/kata/57f90a8d5cae44a9dc000091
the same method of solving the mentioned kata can be used to solve this one.
I'd say it isn't a duplicate as there is more to do to solve this one. Same method yes, but wouldn't that be like saying we should only have one kata to reverse an array, or use a loop?
This comment has been hidden.
Yeah that makes sense, but I believe my comment above still stands
And CoffeeScript translation here
Good to see you got it :D Approved
freeze that require.
:'(
i really enjoyed this kata. i think this is more tricky than just return 'a'
This comment has been hidden.
Re-raised as an issue.
Same as that one, a bit boring...
Not for someone that hasn't come across it before
Wondering a little bit about the rankings for these both katas 4kyu or here 3kyu at the moment - really so difficult (solvable in less than 3 minutes)? Compared to others (more thinking, more typing, more sense) i think the ranking is much too high...;-) So don't wonder, i will only choose a 7 now;-). But good work here, even if a similar one exists:-)!
Easy if you know the trick I do not know this one and I am stuck!!!
Yes, but as you wrote, it's more a "trick" than a hard kata or "complex code" to justify a ranking of 3 or 4 kyu - i think;-). So it's not bad if you can't solve it, there's no practical use...
Even still, 7kyu is beginner level so I think far too low
Yes, you are right, it's just to reduce the average... maybe at the end it's 5 and your earlier one 6 compared to many others...
I just approved your earlier one with 5 (both averages - makes no difference if 5 or 6, two points for the solution)... Later on someone else can approve this one, perhaps it gets a higher ranking, perhaps not, we will see...;-)
Ahaha still have no clue!!! But yes 6 or 5 seems to be fine. It is a trick, I know that just unable to find it.
Ok, will see what i can do...: "Generating some senseless output produces things with letters inside usable for generating meaningful words... but generally as sensless as before";-)... Wow, sounds a little bit philosophical:-)...