Impressive!!
Ruby Translation!
Shell Translation!
Go Translation!
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Nani?
You can actually leave out the '80 <', since failing the first condition automatically rules that out.
I never would have thought to use the set like that. Very clever!
Eva is actually closer to the original Hebrew.
Strings are immutable in Go. So if you append to a string, what it has to create a whole new string every time. String builder on the other hand is mutable, so it's going to be more memory efficient.
Go Translation
Go translation
Approved
Loading collection data...
Impressive!!
Ruby Translation!
Shell Translation!
Go Translation!
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Nani?
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
You can actually leave out the '80 <', since failing the first condition automatically rules that out.
I never would have thought to use the set like that. Very clever!
Eva is actually closer to the original Hebrew.
Strings are immutable in Go. So if you append to a string, what it has to create a whole new string every time. String builder on the other hand is mutable, so it's going to be more memory efficient.
Go Translation
Go translation
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Approved
Loading more items...