• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
C-V Avatar
Name:Unknown
Clan:Unknown
Member Since:Dec 2017
Last Seen:Apr 2025
Profiles:
    Following:0
    Followers:25
    Allies:0
    View Profile Badges
    • Stats
    • Kata
    • Collections
    • Kumite
    • Social
    • Discourse
    • Conversations
    • Replies (27)
    • Authored
    • Needs Resolution
    • Custom User Avatar
      • dfhwze
      • resolved a suggestion on "ASCII Games: Dance Dance Evolution I" kata
      • 3 months ago
    • Custom User Avatar
      • topologoanatom
      • resolved a suggestion on "Pisano Period - Performance Edition" kata
      • 14 months ago

      approved

    • Custom User Avatar
      • Just4FunCoder
      • resolved a suggestion on "Regular Expression for Binary Numbers Divisible by n" kata
      • 15 months ago

      Approved by someone

    • Custom User Avatar
      • BalashovAD
      • commented on "Regular Expression for Binary Numbers Divisible by n" kata
      • 2 years ago

      Do you have a progress with approving?

    • Custom User Avatar
      • monadius
      • commented on "Finding Derivatives" kata
      • 4 years ago

      This happens because of floating-point underflow. Specifically, the derivative of (18*57.2^x-x^x+81.9*x^5.2*x^62)^x is a very small number which is computed as 0 + 0i by the reference solution and as -6.09095e-315 + 8.56785e-314i by my solution. In general, both results are unreliable. Overflow and underflow should be avoided in all randomly generated subexpressions.

    • Custom User Avatar
      • balygaby
      • commented on "Wait without blocking" kata
      • 4 years ago

      Brilliant news! My first approved

    • Custom User Avatar
      • MikChan
      • resolved a question on "Finding Derivatives" kata
      • 4 years ago

      Okay, hopefully I finally fixed this issue.
      About the overflow thing: the marging of error is quite huge actually, so the rule of thumb is if WolframAlpha returns the expected result which is between 10^-300 and 10^300, your soulution should be able to compute it too. Also, when designing this kata, obviosly, I was using WA's results as the refference, so if tests expected result and WA's result don't match, I'd be very grateful if you tell me.

    • Custom User Avatar
      • MikChan
      • commented on "Finding Derivatives" kata
      • 4 years ago

      Of course, since the tested function is actually a constant, I could program the solution to recognize it and directly yield 0 for the derivatives.

      Can't give clues, but probably?..

      But then the same problem arises with more complex random tests such as

      This particular test case shouldn't even appear, seems like I missed something. I'll fix it soon.

    • Custom User Avatar
      • hobovsky
      • commented on "Wait without blocking" kata
      • 4 years ago
      • Execute me nTimes
      • Concurrent task execution
    • Custom User Avatar
      • stuenofotso@gmail.com
      • commented on "BECOME IMMORTAL" kata
      • 5 years ago

      ?

    • Custom User Avatar
      • Gena2018115rus
      • commented on "Regular Expression for Binary Numbers Divisible by n" kata
      • 5 years ago

      Hi, can someone approve this?

    • Custom User Avatar
      • user8436785
      • resolved a suggestion on "Whitespace Interpreter" kata
      • 6 years ago
    • Custom User Avatar
      • nomennescio
      • commented on "Whitespace Interpreter" kata
      • 6 years ago

      Approved

    • Custom User Avatar
      • user4850992
      • commented on "Symbolic differentiation of prefix expressions" kata
      • 7 years ago

      .

    • Custom User Avatar
      • Blind4Basics
      • commented on "The boolean order" kata
      • 7 years ago

      @C-V: did you fix the C++ translation? (see issue above)

    • Loading more items...
    • © 2025 Codewars
    • About
    • API
    • Blog
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Code of Conduct
    • Contact

    Confirm

    • Cancel
    • Confirm

    Collect: undefined

    Loading collection data...