same ans but took me 5mins

I didn't realise -number was possible to write, so learnt something new here! Thanks! :)

Heya, I have fixed this, this seems to be a bit of a legacy description. I've updated it.

You should change this line:
Input: a single string with player names first (alphabetic tokens), followed by signed integers (round scores).
It falsely leads the user to expect clean input.

bro for me you also need to write if len(s) == 2: return " " i think it would be better and nice

Nice

me too but that is also training :-)

Just reminder, this is O(n*m) running complexity, changing with set(b) would make the lookup time O(1)

Too many wires defined
Should not have accepted too many wires defined: expected false to equal true
Completed in 1ms

Not enough wire ends defined
Should not have accepted a partial wire definition: expected false to equal true

Wires are only mapped once
Should not have accepted a second definition for a wire end: expected false to equal true
what these errors are? what does it meant by legitimate wire paring

Hi, please do not discuss code or solutions without a spoiler flag, or anyone can read it.

I put the flag on your comment.

easy XD