Yes, but 6 and 7 are incorrect, because the next correct number after 1 is 2, which doesn't appear. Therefore, all that comes after 1 is missplaced and should be included in the returned list. I changed the description to "Incorrect page numbers may appear next to each other".
From the description:
"The sequence will always be 10 numbers long and we know that the base is going to be between 2 and 10 inclusive"
"When sorted, the sequence is made up of consecutive numbers."
Ten consecutive numbers always contain all available digits in bases < 10
OP solved it, closing
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
intresting
Yes, but
6and7are incorrect, because the next correct number after1is2, which doesn't appear. Therefore, all that comes after1is missplaced and should be included in the returned list. I changed the description to "Incorrect page numbers may appear next to each other".The recursion stops when the parameter becomes 0. It is falsy so will return 0, then rollback :)
Duplicate issue of
no sample testsbelowFrom the description:
"The sequence will always be 10 numbers long and we know that the base is going to be between 2 and 10 inclusive"
"When sorted, the sequence is made up of consecutive numbers."
Ten consecutive numbers always contain all available digits in bases < 10
Language?
yeah, just use 3.8. It effectively times out in 3.6.
I'll try to update the kata this evening (the tests are "old fashion", for now)
edit: done
I just tried the current version of the tests and everything is ok, even with an empty code on the user side... => ?
(tried with 3.8)
We don't always get what we want. @Blind4Basics could you take a look at it?
There is an open (in fact there are 2) issue about that, there is no need to open another. Closing.
Loading more items...