• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
IVBakker Avatar
Name:Unknown
Clan:Unknown
Member Since:May 2014
Last Seen:Oct 2022
Profiles:
Following:2
Followers:5
Allies:0
View Profile Badges
  • Stats
  • Kata
  • Collections
  • Kumite
  • Social
  • Discourse
  • Conversations (515)
  • Replies
  • Authored
  • Needs Resolution
  • Custom User Avatar
    • dfhwze
    • commented on "Seat Allocation Double Dutch" kata
    • 2 months ago

    I found quite a few, you arrogant dutch-man:

    • The example shows the quota as a ceiled integer, is that for display purposes or hidden spec that we need to ceil total votes over total seats?
    • You don't explain which method of "highest average of votes per seat" to use. Only in the wiki page there is a reference to the method used in Dutch elections. I'm not even sure you use that one.
    • You don't explain whether continious updates of seats should be used in assigning residual votes, or a snapshot should be taken a priori, both in first phase, as in recalculation of seats in coalitions.
  • Custom User Avatar
    • SummerTheCoder
    • commented on "Unscrambled eggs" javascript solution
    • 3 months ago

    hm... didn't think that such a simple pattern would work. but okay i guess.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Chrono79
    • resolved an issue on "Is there a sequence re-occuring in the list" kata
    • 3 months ago

    It should be fixed.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Chrono79
    • commented on "Is there a sequence re-occuring in the list" kata
    • 3 months ago

    Try again with your previous code, close the issue if it is fixed.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Chrono79
    • commented on "Is there a sequence re-occuring in the list" kata
    • 3 months ago

    Probably, because your current code works and doesn't mutate the input array.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • phatcabbage
    • created an issue for "Is there a sequence re-occuring in the list" kata
    • 3 months ago

    Some of the random testing in JS seems a bit off.

      ["w","8","k","g","s","3","4","m","1","V","D",
       "r", // <--
       "A","L","t","u","l","n","E","z","q",
       "r", // <--
       "Y","F"]
       
       ["Q", // <--
       "0","g",
       "Q",  // <--
       "3","q","m","n","9","L","W","9","Z","H","e","J","g","I","a","n","B"]
    

    Expected: false. Actual: true.


    Not sure if it could be related to the same input modification issue that another user mentioned regarding Python,
    as my solution does modify the items input array.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • dfhwze
    • resolved an issue on "Is there a sequence re-occuring in the list" kata
    • 3 months ago

    performance issue fixed

  • Custom User Avatar
    • dfhwze
    • resolved an issue on "Is there a sequence re-occuring in the list" kata
    • 3 months ago

    fixed

  • Custom User Avatar
    • dfhwze
    • resolved an issue on "Is there a sequence re-occuring in the list" kata
    • 3 months ago

    fixed

  • Custom User Avatar
    • dfhwze
    • resolved a suggestion on "Is there a sequence re-occuring in the list" kata
    • 3 months ago
  • Custom User Avatar
    • FrankK
    • commented on "Seat Allocation Double Dutch" kata
    • 3 months ago

    You don't want to be patronized?

    I tried very very hard to understand what you do not understand. Everything is written down. What is not to understand about the line below? Is it maybe the word 'standard' that you read as 'allocation of seats excluding residual seats'? No clue, the sentence below talks about 'standard allocation' as opposed to 'allocation within combination'.

    'A combination is treated as 1 party but after the standard allocation the seats gathered by the combination need to be allocated again to its individual members.'

    Keep opposing bad specs! You will not find them in this kata.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • dfhwze
    • commented on "Seat Allocation Double Dutch" kata
    • 3 months ago

    Don't patronise me, in my long career I've always challenged bad specs.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • FrankK
    • commented on "Seat Allocation Double Dutch" kata
    • 3 months ago

    Everything you need to know is in the description. Just read better. From my 30 years of experience that is sometimes hard for developers (also when I read the comments here).

    And yes, kata is hard. I did the kata myself too and had a problem with it.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Just4FunCoder
    • resolved a suggestion on "Magic Zeckendorf" kata
    • 5 months ago

    Enabled in this fork

  • Custom User Avatar
    • dfhwze
    • commented on "Seat Allocation Double Dutch" kata
    • 5 months ago

    Yeah, this description is a pain. Also allocating the remaining residual seats after combinations have been handled is a complete mystery. I wanted to solve this kata out of loving memory for Pim, but F it, just not worth it.

  • Loading more items...
  • © 2025 Codewars
  • About
  • API
  • Blog
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact

Confirm

  • Cancel
  • Confirm

Collect: undefined

Loading collection data...