A random tests on negative rounded values failed. Another try with same code has been successfull.
I saw that it was already previously araised, and recently annouced as solved.
Still an issue ?

Why not. Pls could you write a solution corresponding to your proposal

Hi ,

just a remark about the desciption : as you clearly separate 2 cases : a==0 and a!=0, y'are not obliged to repeat if a==0 for the different subcases in the first case

Hi
I understood that in case of equality in damages between 2 weapons we have to select the first in alphabetic order ,
with python I got an error with that order and no error with the reverse alphabetic order

c'est bien ce que j'avais cru comprendre :)

with a little help from ChatGPT , I succeeded to obtain the result I wanted with a 2-stairs implementation of closure , one for the class and yours called by the first one

import inspect
def method_logger(method): 
    def wrapper(self, *a, **kw):
        call   = method.__name__ if method.__name__!='__init__' else self.__class__.__name__
        args   = ''.join( f', {v!r}' for v in a)
        kwargs = ''.join( f', {k}={v!r}' for k,v in kw.items() )
        print(f"{call}(self{args}{kwargs})")
        return method(self, *a, **kw)
    return wrapper

def class_logger(classe):
    for method_name, method in inspect.getmembers(classe, inspect.isfunction):
        setattr(classe, method_name, method_logger(method))
    return classe

@class_logger
class Atom(object):

what do you think of the result ?

without any connection : why did you use the term 'frenglish' in the discussions below ?

not at ease with decorators.

must dig

thanks for this generic helpfull closure.

Thanks for the quick answer.

Simple concept, never used before on my side, but efficient, that takes more time than a simple print, especially to identify specifically both called methods and arguments.

I'm just at the beginning of this very funny kata, as an objects' fan I appreciate a lot.

At first I was trying to find more examples to see how atoms, added outside of branches are treated, especially how to deal with their id after the molecule's unlocking, but I had forgotten the possible use of the attribute atoms to memorize the creation's order.

Hi
A general question about debugging classes:

• in a classical kata ,ie call of a funtion , you can print the arguments
• when working with classes, how can I capture the sequence of instructions of a specific test

Thanks in advance

Hi

Ok for basic tests , but why this board should return 0, for me it's 3 , but result is not accepted
'''
[[0, 1, 0, 0, 1],
[0, 0, 0, 1, 1],
[0, 0, 1, 1, 1],
[0, 0, 0, 1, 0],
[0, 1, 0, 0, 0]]
'''

y're right,works without, probably reflex or lazyness to improve a working code :)

Hi
my code works with the present tests ,
but if the max of the array is simultaneously at the beginning and the end , it should fail :
so the tests should take that conf into account

Hi
Just a remark : robots are not objects as said in the Details, but dictionnaries : code is less simple
and if they were objects , we could have written a method for the fight

what I didnt understood was that the error appeared only in the first random test. I will test now.
Edit : It works now, and I saw that you duplicate my code to check your fix.
If you had imposed that the input must remain unchanged, my code would have been different :)