thanks!

TypeScript translation

Fixed.

I removed the link, it indeed worked strange.

consider this a suggestion instead.

The link in the description, on (see References) points to the python trainer.

EDIT: nope, it's "ok", but actually useless.

Cheers

I will fix this with some next incoming translation, thanks for spotting.
Or maybe not. "speratated" sounds like a really cool word.

It seems that all languages I plan to add (Java, Scala, Rust, Ruby, PHP) support Unicode code points in a way sufficient to solve this task.
C and C++ can be tricky, but I can make assumptions which will make things equally easy. I have not decided yet.
It appears that the only potentially problematic languages will be for example OCaml and others with "usability rating" which I would estimate as "not applicable" :)

I unlock this issue as it seems that all relevant languages are eqipped with proper APIs, and (as far as I've checked) it seems that none of them will need to handle surrogate pairs manually.

It's here

Thanks for feedback. Could you share the discord link?

Emojicode string is a string of space speratated code points

"separated"

Your random tests are vulnerable to input modification ( I could not submit, but I think you can still see my solution by clicking under this comment ), and your submit test suite is missing fixed tests ( should have had the example tests as a section of the submit tests ).

This would [ very probably ] have been pointed out if you had posted a link to Discord#reviewing before publishing.

In general, the idea was apparently ( somewhat ) better than the previous one, but still not good enough. Inviting the use of eval in solutions is often frowned upon as well.

If people don't subtitle their vote, it's impossible to know for sure what killed the kata, but you're still dropping the ball on a number of things people could have told you in advance.

I would suggest not immediately publishing the new one, and posting the direct link to the unpublished kata in Discord#reviewing, so people can give their opinion on whether or not it is sufficiently novel.

Ehm, if the new one was Count bots, this advice was too late. Just know it's an option if you should want to try again.

Made it more interested now?
EDIT: never mind. deleted and made a new one

It's just my first kata. I made it simple and focus more on familiarize myself with the authoring tool. My next one is gonna be more interesting ig.