people should have voted for this solution as clever

Always a treat to see the problem description transcribed to near English. Great solution.

nice

11 - the eleventh
12 - the twelfth
13 - the thirteenth

Fix this tests please...
expect( ws( 1001 ) ).to.equal( '11th' )
expect( ws( 1101 ) ).to.equal( '12th' )
expect( ws( 1201 ) ).to.equal( '13th' )

Math.pow(a, b)

[][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]([][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([][[]]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([][[]]+[])[+[]]+([][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]()([][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]([][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+([][[]]+[])[+!+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]+([][[]]+[])[+[]]+([][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]]+[])[!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]+(!![]+[][(![]+[])[+[]]+(![]+[])[!+[]+!+[]]+(![]+[])[+!+[]]+(!![]+[])[+[]]])[+!+[]+[+[]]]+(!![]+[])[+!+[]]())

Hi,

Do you plan on publishing your kata, at some point?

Cheers

x)

each return line is a possible way to implement my function and all of them are currently passing the tests. But only the last one is supposed to be correct (I believe... Depends on the specs). The first ones should be invalidated with one (or more) of the edge cases I talked about in the issue below. Clearer?

You can now republish the kata, because all the issues are closed. That way, I can submit my code and see the tests. That would make easier the review process.

yes, it's still happening, but I had to close the issues to be able to submit (except it's still not republished...)

My solution still seems to be running into this in random tests. Did something change?

.

I misunderstood what you wrote in your first comment.
It just seems to me that you have a lot of unnecessary actions, I also don’t understand the comment "shouldn't pass"