💯✔️

It's the most wonderful time of the year!

Here we go...

@stɛffan153 Thank you for the reminder!

@Robson It's coming soon, remember :)

please see issue above.
Seems edit kata button is gone (for me), so you can fork it instead.

Approved.

They're similar, but you have to return a subset here, with only one different digit per number, the result in the other kata is way larger when the number of digits grow. They're the same only when the number has only one digit.

not really. The one of your link is more general. Tho, there are "some" similarities, ofc.

I see that a test case exists for this in the two languages (Python and Java), so presumably someone has added that in.

If I remove the zero-kate-check from my Python solution then it fails to pass the test cases, as it should do.

So I'm going to consider this resolved.

I've put a note in the calendar! 📅

done.

hi, please take a look at the issue above and patch your translation.

Thank you! I've changed the description as you suggested