• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
Michal2012 Avatar
Name:Unknown
Clan:Unknown
Member Since:Feb 2022
Last Seen:Jun 2023
Profiles:
    Following:1
    Followers:0
    Allies:0
    View Profile Badges
    • Stats
    • Kata
    • Collections
    • Kumite
    • Social
    • Discourse
    • Conversations (20)
    • Replies
    • Authored
    • Needs Resolution
    • Custom User Avatar
      • Michal2012
      • commented on "Remove the minimum" kata
      • 3 years ago

      This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

    • Custom User Avatar
      • hsnu0205
      • commented on "Are they the "same"?" kata
      • 3 years ago

      thank you!

    • Custom User Avatar
      • Arcynic49
      • commented on "Are they the "same"?" kata
      • 3 years ago

      All well and good, I was merely confused by a previous kata which printed all test data, showing which test was being failed on final acceptance, versus this one which did not.

      However that doesn't address the problem, which is this line under Remarks:

      If a or b are nil (or null or None, depending on the language), the problem doesn't make sense so return false.

      The "or" here is ambiguous (exclusive? not exclusive?) and has clearly lead many people to be confused by the double empty array case failing when their function returns false as implied in the quote. It's fine if the test remains but the language should be more precise.

    • Custom User Avatar
      • benjaminzwhite
      • commented on "Are they the "same"?" kata
      • 3 years ago

      I don't know what language you are working in, but it's probably one of the edge case tests which is testing for unexpected data types as inputs:

      To solve this issue you should print the input:

      How to print inputs from the kata

      however you do that in your language; then you will be able to see which inputs are causing your code to fail.

    • Custom User Avatar
      • hsnu0205
      • commented on "Are they the "same"?" kata
      • 3 years ago

      This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

    • Custom User Avatar
      • Chrono79
      • commented on "Are they the "same"?" kata
      • 3 years ago

      Because with sets you lose how many of each kind you have.

    • Custom User Avatar
      • Michal2012
      • commented on "Are they the "same"?" kata
      • 3 years ago

      Why I can't compare sets, it doesn't work in one instance. when i compare sorted lists it works without any problem.

    • Custom User Avatar
      • CarlosDiaz214
      • commented on "Are they the "same"?" kata
      • 3 years ago

      im a beginner but my only guess is because you are comparing '161' with '11*11'.. Im not an expert but that is my guess since i struggled on this one for a while, good luck.

    • Custom User Avatar
      • Michal2012
      • commented on "Are they the "same"?" kata
      • 3 years ago

      This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

    • Custom User Avatar
      • TheAlmightyDada
      • commented on "Convert string to camel case" kata
      • 4 years ago

      This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

    • Custom User Avatar
      • i-polishchuk
      • commented on "Sum of positive" kata
      • 4 years ago

      This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

    • Custom User Avatar
      • Michal2012
      • commented on "Sum of positive" kata
      • 4 years ago

      This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

    • Custom User Avatar
      • Chrono79
      • commented on "Exes and Ohs" kata
      • 4 years ago

      Your code should work for capital letters too.

    • Custom User Avatar
      • Michal2012
      • commented on "Convert string to camel case" kata
      • 4 years ago

      Thank you very much!

    • Custom User Avatar
      • Michal2012
      • commented on "Exes and Ohs" kata
      • 4 years ago

      This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

    • Loading more items...
    • © 2025 Codewars
    • About
    • API
    • Blog
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Code of Conduct
    • Contact

    Confirm

    • Cancel
    • Confirm

    Collect: undefined

    Loading collection data...