• ###### hobovskyresolved an issue on "Expressions Matter " kata

Should be fixed. If the description is still unclear let me know, or even better, propose some better wording.

Good

• ###### Just4FunCodercreated a suggestion for "Tidy Number (Special Numbers Series #9)" kata

This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

• ###### Chrono79commented on "Maximum Product " kata

What is the input and what is your function returning? It seems this should be a question, not a kata issue.

• ###### Snyasimicreated an issue for "Maximum Product " kata

This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

• ###### vishalicious213commented on "Century From Year" kata

I solved it. My logic was wrong. Now that I've seen the other solutions, I can't believe that I forgot about the method that would have made this a one-liner.

• ###### B1tscommented on "Century From Year" kata

Maybe your solution is removing those zeros. For year 692628, the correct answer is 6927, not 70 (your answer). Same goes for other tests.

• ###### vishalicious213commented on "Century From Year" kata

The tests when attempting to solve the problem are broken for large years. I think it's removing the last two 0's.

``````Testing for year 692628: expected 70 to equal 6927
Testing for year 322573: expected 33 to equal 3226
Testing for year 282491: expected 29 to equal 2825
``````
• ###### syntaxsaviorcommented on "Maximum Triplet Sum (Array Series #7) " kata

Solved it thanks to your comment.

• ###### scheglovcreated an issue for "Maximum Multiple" kata

It says "N is greater than 0."
But actually for `(4, 1)` the answer must be zero.

• ###### bobrien-pursuitcreated a suggestion for "Maximum Multiple" kata

You need to test for the case when n is the divisor and 2n+1 is the bound and 2n is the solution. I passed the test using a for loop but I would have failed this test so I got a false positive.

smart! 0.0

• ###### Soskufucommented on "Form The Minimum" cpp solution

could you please explain whats going on after the 0ull

• ###### iLintucreated an issue for "Maximum Multiple" kata

Relational databases assume that the order of rows in the resulting set doesn't matter, BUT in this exercise different rows order leads to unacceptable solution. It looks like we need a specific order clause to solve this misconception

• ###### carolinaperdigaocommented on "Find the smallest integer in the array" cpp solution

I'd give u a downvote bc of this comment, go back to stackoverflow.