• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
NuTheory Avatar
Name:Derek Rush
Clan:cffd
Member Since:Mar 2015
Last Seen:Dec 2021
Profiles:
Following:0
Followers:0
Allies:0
View Profile Badges
  • Stats
  • Kata
  • Collections
  • Kumite
  • Social
  • Discourse
  • Conversations (11)
  • Replies
  • Authored
  • Needs Resolution
  • Custom User Avatar
    • user8436785
    • commented on ""A Simplistic TCP Finite State Machine (FSM)" Elixir Translation"
    • 6 years ago

    needs random tests

  • Custom User Avatar
    • donaldsebleung
    • resolved a suggestion on "RoboScript #1 - Implement Syntax Highlighting" kata
    • 6 years ago
  • Custom User Avatar
    • NuTheory
    • created a suggestion for "RoboScript #1 - Implement Syntax Highlighting" kata
    • 6 years ago

    Elixir Translation

  • Custom User Avatar
    • NuTheory
    • created a suggestion for "A Simplistic TCP Finite State Machine (FSM)" kata
    • 6 years ago

    Elixir translation submitted.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Fl4m3Ph03n1x
    • commented on "Thinkful - Number Drills: Pixelart planning" elixir solution
    • 7 years ago

    Kernel functions don't need the Kernel prefix on them. You can use them directly :D

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Chrono79
    • commented on "Which are in?" kata
    • 7 years ago

    Not all cases are (or should be) covered in the sample tests, that's why they're samples ;)
    I would try using methods better suited for this job (like I did).

  • Custom User Avatar
    • NuTheory
    • commented on "Which are in?" kata
    • 7 years ago

    i get that given that test my code fails, 100% it fails but shouldnt that test be in the intial test sample? i used the test to understand the problem. these are abstract problems.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Chrono79
    • commented on "Which are in?" kata
    • 7 years ago

    Definetly it's a problem with your code, try copying this test in the sample test tab:

    dotest 3, ["oint", "wh", "ple"], ["you", "would", "a", "versioning;", "your", "me", "answer", "using", "have", "here", "for", "ruby-doc.", "In", "neither", "pointed", "I", "browse", "you", "1.9?", "I", "am", "updated", "most", "out", "glad", "what", "I", "input", "that", "your", "does"], ["oint", "wh"]
    You can see the expected answer is ok, oint and wh are present in pointed and what.
    That reduce + map doesn't look ok.
    I'm not so well versed in Elixir to say you exactly where in your code is the problem, my code seems simpler to me and passed all the tests. Maybe someone else can give you better help than me.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • NuTheory
    • commented on "Which are in?" kata
    • 7 years ago

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Chrono79
    • commented on "Which are in?" kata
    • 7 years ago

    I just solved it in Elixir with no problem, could you be more specific?

  • Custom User Avatar
    • NuTheory
    • commented on "Which are in?" kata
    • 7 years ago

    elixir tests broken also

  • © 2025 Codewars
  • About
  • API
  • Blog
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact

Confirm

  • Cancel
  • Confirm

Collect: undefined

Loading collection data...