• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
Nuno Avatar
Name:Nuno
Clan:IST
Skills:python, c, java, c++
Member Since:Sep 2015
Last Seen:Nov 2019
Profiles:
Following:54
Followers:55
Allies:53
View Profile Badges
  • Stats
  • Kata
  • Collections
  • Kumite
  • Social
  • Discourse
  • Conversations
  • Replies (7)
  • Authored
  • Needs Resolution
  • Custom User Avatar
    • ejini战神
    • resolved a question on "Integers: Recreation One" kata
    • 15 months ago

    OP solved it, closing

  • Custom User Avatar
    • ejini战神
    • resolved a question on "Satisfying numbers" kata
    • 5 years ago
  • Custom User Avatar
    • cliffstamp
    • resolved an issue on "Transpose of a Matrix" kata
    • 7 years ago

    That was a common issue, the description would have helped.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Voile
    • resolved an issue on "Square(n) Sum" kata
    • 7 years ago

    Don't mutate the input.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • DeanBrown
    • commented on "Transpose of a Matrix" kata
    • 10 years ago

    It is solvable. The kata just expects [] if the array is empty
    and [[]] if the array only contains empty arrays.

    so [[]] or [[],[]] would return [[]]

    but [] would return []

    I do however agree that this is an issue. The kata should either describe what to do in each case, or return the same value for an empty array and an array of empty arrays

  • Custom User Avatar
    • joh_pot
    • commented on "Satisfying numbers" kata
    • 10 years ago

    You need to think about optimizing the algorithm. A O(N^2) solution is too slow.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • jgillard
    • commented on "Satisfying numbers" kata
    • 10 years ago

    I'm having the same problem

  • © 2025 Codewars
  • About
  • API
  • Blog
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact

Confirm

  • Cancel
  • Confirm

Collect: undefined

Loading collection data...