Good kata, thank you!

approved

OCaml translation

I made the wording more specific, but without any more precision, I dont think "rounded up" is ambiguous, it always refers to the next integer. Otherwise, it would be written "rounded up to the 3rd decimal" or similar.

fixed

you do not suggest any improvement :/

Needs a better description. "Rounding up/down" can be ambiguous. If 7.51 is an input, is rounding up 7.60 or 8.00?

this note has been removed at some point

you are not using the provided parameter size as you should, instead you do int length = sizeof(arr) / sizeof(int);, which does not work when the array is a function argument. arrays are passed to functions as pointers, the information about their length is lost in the process

this is already suggested there

Basically just used to validate a statement on the left side, if true return whatever is directly after "?", if not return whatever is after ':'. It's quicker to write than an if else once you get used to the syntax.

You are making a few mistakes. You do not need to provide your own inputs, that's what the input x is for in the function definition. Additionally, you need to return the output, not print it.

You might find these two docs helpful:

• How to train on a Codewars kata
• Troubleshooting your solution

I tried using the strip() and the replace() method on Python, but nothing is working. Am I doing doing something wrong or do I have to use another method entirely?

now on dart Translation Dart

Author inactive