I tried to run your solution without {-# LANGUAGE ImportQualifiedPost #-} and tests passed. You also need to change import Data.Traversable qualified as T to import qualified Data.Traversable as T
Try to add {-# LANGUAGE Haskell2010 #-} and fix compilation errors. It seems the issue is because of lib used to validate imports. It fails if code is not a valid Haskell2010.
I don't see how that should prevent the kata from approving. It's not like this results in an exploit of a high level kata. I wouldn't worry too much about such solutions on an easy kata.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
bro is code golfing, it's a cool kata to codegolf, he's good
Forked and approved
I tried to run your solution without
{-# LANGUAGE ImportQualifiedPost #-}
and tests passed. You also need to changeimport Data.Traversable qualified as T
toimport qualified Data.Traversable as T
Already rejected
Try to add
{-# LANGUAGE Haskell2010 #-}
and fix compilation errors. It seems the issue is because of lib used to validate imports. It fails if code is not a valid Haskell2010.Навзаєм. Якщо ти питаєш про ()(), то це IIFE
Вітаю. Розкажи будь-ласка, що тут відбувається?
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Drunk? my boy is as high as the clouds hahaha
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Exactly, what I said. :D
I don't think that's an issue. It's more work than the expected solution, so considering the probable rank of the kata, it's fine.
I don't see how that should prevent the kata from approving. It's not like this results in an exploit of a high level kata. I wouldn't worry too much about such solutions on an easy kata.
what's wrong with solution ... it's the same difficulty solving it this or that way
Loading more items...