I mean that your first response it's out of place, and I assume like I'm talking with an adult in a nice place like CodeWars where the adult people try to help each order in a way that everybody could be able to improve they skills.
So, I'm gonna just response to your second one, which is a really nice help from something competent.
You said: "I mean, we're not testing anything about adding, so why not put something that makes more sense, like test_basic?"
I said: LOL, I just tryed to figure how to make a quickly Rust translation from Python and I don't care about that.
Gonna change this inmediatly! Thank you for your improve.
And talking with the second steffan153 I feel more confortable and happy to belong to CW community :)
pythontutor.com
What's your Python visualizer of choice?
is this real ?
+1
approved
I mean that your first response it's out of place, and I assume like I'm talking with an adult in a nice place like CodeWars where the adult people try to help each order in a way that everybody could be able to improve they skills.
So, I'm gonna just response to your second one, which is a really nice help from something competent.
You said: "I mean, we're not testing anything about adding, so why not put something that makes more sense, like
test_basic
?"I said: LOL, I just tryed to figure how to make a quickly Rust translation from Python and I don't care about that.
Gonna change this inmediatly! Thank you for your improve.
And talking with the second
steffan153
I feel more confortable and happy to belong to CW community :)You mean https://www.dictionary.com/browse/applicable ?
I mean, we're not testing anything about adding, so why not put something that makes more sense, like
test_basic
?Can you first define "more applicable"?
Rust translation availiable.
Asking for review and approve :)
Can you change the
test_add
to something more... applicable?Rust translation availiable.
Asking for approve :)
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
The unique wrong thing there is JS X)
Lol, like the way u thought about the solution.
Really nice to see two def, one for control the n, and other for the operation.
GJ