Of course there is a shortest solution, probably only one.
Are you interested in getting the shortest possible solution umpteen times, or people challenging their creativity to come up with different short, but not necessarily shortest, versions? Some people might even submit code that sacrifices some shortness for increased readability (though in this case, the shortest solution is quite readable).
ETA: the limit as it is does not really need relaxing. see above somewhere.
Currently, all languages do have at least 1 zero step test (d = 0).
Resolving this.
Thanks Chrono
erm, why not?
Satisfication rating shouldn't be influenced by the quality of the test cases.
Added 100 random tests.
Not a suggestion.
Re-raised as an issue.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Re-raised a better-worded issue above
.
well the test cases are correct and everything works for me
.
Done.
I replaced the JS tests completely to be in line with the tests on every other language.
Alternatively, you could relax the limit.
Of course there is a shortest solution, probably only one.
Are you interested in getting the shortest possible solution umpteen times, or people challenging their creativity to come up with different short, but not necessarily shortest, versions? Some people might even submit code that sacrifices some shortness for increased readability (though in this case, the shortest solution is quite readable).
ETA: the limit as it is does not really need relaxing. see above somewhere.
thanks
Loading more items...