• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
Skratch Avatar
Name:Unknown
Clan:Unknown
Member Since:Aug 2015
Last Seen:Dec 2015
Profiles:
Following:0
Followers:2
Allies:0
View Profile Badges
  • Stats
  • Kata
  • Collections
  • Kumite
  • Social
  • Discourse
  • Conversations
  • Replies
  • Authored (18)
  • Needs Resolution
  • Custom User Avatar
    • Skratch
    • commented on "Hamming Distance - Part 1: Binary codes" kata
    • 10 years ago

    Yes, I found that one after I wrote my Kata. For some strange reason, it wasn't shown when I searched for "Hamming" before I wrote the Kata. But I'll make sure not to write a duplicate.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Skratch
    • resolved an issue on "Hamming Distance - Part 1: Binary codes" kata
    • 10 years ago

    I mark the issue as resolved now.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Skratch
    • commented on "Hamming Distance - Part 1: Binary codes" kata
    • 10 years ago

    It would be most appreciated!

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Skratch
    • commented on "Hamming Distance - Part 1: Binary codes" kata
    • 10 years ago

    Approved your translations. Thank you for your work! :-)

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Skratch
    • commented on "Hamming Distance - Part 1: Binary codes" kata
    • 10 years ago

    Thanks for your feedback. I changed the description.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Skratch
    • commented on "Triangular range" kata
    • 10 years ago

    Thank you for your feedback (also to my other Kata)! Happy to hear that! I will keep your suggestion in mind and also extend the random tests for this one.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Skratch
    • commented on "You look like a classy instance! Show me what you've got! - Part 1" kata
    • 10 years ago

    Ok, now I think I have it right. Thanks again for your help!

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Skratch
    • commented on "You look like a classy instance! Show me what you've got! - Part 1" kata
    • 10 years ago

    Have another look.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Skratch
    • commented on "You look like a classy instance! Show me what you've got! - Part 1" kata
    • 10 years ago

    Good point :-D I will find out how to and do that. Thanks for the advice!

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Skratch
    • commented on "Calculation of the Angles of a Triangle" kata
    • 10 years ago

    Good to know it wasn't my problem ;-) Thanks for your answer!

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Skratch
    • resolved an issue on "Binary operations #1" kata
    • 10 years ago

    Thank you! :-)

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Skratch
    • commented on "Binary operations #1" kata
    • 10 years ago

    Thanks. But I would also remove the "index 31 for MSB" for two reasons: For 32-bit integers, if you start with index 1 for 1st bit, the 32nd bit would be index 32, not 31. And for dynamically typed languages such as Python, the parameter depends on the type passed to the function - could also be a 64-bit long and therefore the MSB would be index 64. Not a real issue, but could be confusing, I think.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Skratch
    • commented on "Calculation of the Angles of a Triangle" kata
    • 10 years ago

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Skratch
    • created an issue for "Binary operations #1" kata
    • 10 years ago

    I would change the description for the bit index a bit: Something like "the index of the least significant bit is 1".

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Skratch
    • created an issue for "List length v1" kata
    • 10 years ago

    As others reported already, the parameter 'list' should be renamed. And I always think it's a good idea to have an example in the description, even for simple tasks.

  • Loading more items...
  • © 2025 Codewars
  • About
  • API
  • Blog
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact

Confirm

  • Cancel
  • Confirm

Collect: undefined

Loading collection data...