• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
ThomasL Avatar
Name:Tom
Clan:OIS
Skills:java, javascript, node, html, css, php, python, coffeescript, typescript
Member Since:Aug 2016
Last Seen:Sep 2024
Profiles:
Following:5
Followers:5
Allies:5
View Profile Badges
  • Stats
  • Kata
  • Collections
  • Kumite
  • Social
  • Discourse
  • Conversations (123)
  • Replies
  • Authored
  • Needs Resolution
  • Custom User Avatar
    • lotheravanti
    • commented on "Sum of Triangular Numbers" kata
    • 22 days ago

    Neat kata. I did look up the formula however.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Rissotto
    • commented on "Sum of Triangular Numbers" kata
    • 28 days ago

    oh ok, thanks a lot

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Chrono79
    • commented on "Sum of Triangular Numbers" kata
    • last month

    For SQL katas, you shouldn't create functions, normally it's just a select statement what you should write:

    --# write your SQL statement here:

    -- you are given a table 'sumtriangular' with column 'n'

    -- return a table with this column and your result in a column named 'res'.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Rissotto
    • commented on "Sum of Triangular Numbers" kata
    • last month

    I do not understand how to submit it properly in postgresql. I created a function but sample data does not see it. It is working only if I manually SELECT * FROM function. What should I do?

  • Custom User Avatar
    • hobovsky
    • commented on "Product of Adjacent Grid Numbers" kata
    • 3 months ago

    It is written in the description as " your task is to find the largest possible product between four adjacent numbers in the same direction" (emphasis mine). You think it is not clear enough?

    About the sizes of the matrices, you are right. Throwing large matrices at users tends to result in a poor feedback, and there are ways to make it better. Apparently, the author (or translator) could not be bothered. You can rise the poor quality of feedback on failure as an issue, and it will be hopefully handled some day, by someone :)

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Anti-RakPro
    • commented on "Product of Adjacent Grid Numbers" kata
    • 3 months ago

    1st. Did i miss or in description nothing said about multiplier of 4 biggest numbers in a row(horizontal, vertical or diagonal.)
    2dn. It is so hard to test arr 66 by 66 numbers.
    Now i googling how to fitt it in my code editor screen, to bee grid like. you write code for 4 by 4 and 6 by 6, and then baaam 66*66. Nice

  • Custom User Avatar
    • hobovsky
    • resolved an issue on "Product of Adjacent Grid Numbers" kata
    • 3 months ago

    Fixed.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • joshfuller8
    • commented on "Sum of Triangular Numbers" kata
    • 16 months ago

    What's with all these kata lately requiring complex mathematical theory and not including the calculation? bro, I just want to code

  • Custom User Avatar
    • ejini战神
    • resolved an issue on "Abundant Array" kata
    • 2 years ago

    fixed in OP's fork

  • Custom User Avatar
    • ejini战神
    • resolved a suggestion on "Abundant Array" kata
    • 2 years ago

    Approved

  • Custom User Avatar
    • saudiGuy
    • created a suggestion for "Abundant Array" kata
    • 2 years ago

    python new test framework is required. updated in this fork

  • Custom User Avatar
    • saudiGuy
    • created an issue for "Abundant Array" kata
    • 2 years ago

    Python :
    You will be given n, a number between 0 and 300

    solutions are tested upto n<=200 only.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • ejini战神
    • created an issue for "Product of Adjacent Grid Numbers" kata
    • 2 years ago

    In PHP:

    • Actual and expected are swapped

    • NO fixed tests

  • Custom User Avatar
    • SebastianOrtegaCL
    • commented on "Function 1 - hello world" javascript solution
    • 2 years ago

    =)

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Chrono79
    • commented on "Sum of Triangular Numbers" kata
    • 2 years ago

    Read this then: https://docs.codewars.com/training/training-example

  • Loading more items...
  • © 2025 Codewars
  • About
  • API
  • Blog
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact

Confirm

  • Cancel
  • Confirm

Collect: undefined

Loading collection data...