• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
Turim Avatar
Name:Alexander Enaldiev
Clan:Unknown
Member Since:Nov 2018
Last Seen:Mar 2024
Profiles:
Following:0
Followers:0
Allies:0
View Profile Badges
  • Stats
  • Kata
  • Collections
  • Kumite
  • Social
  • Discourse
  • Conversations (5)
  • Replies
  • Authored
  • Needs Resolution
  • Custom User Avatar
    • Mechazawa
    • commented on "Split Strings" cpp solution
    • 3 years ago

    man people try to write the shortest most compicated answer and people praise it but they completely forget lisibility.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • hobovsky
    • commented on "Snail" kata
    • 5 years ago

    You should read the description better, the cause of all this "strangeness" is explained there.
    This kata has some... interesting understanding of what "square of size 0" is :(

    You should also read about code formatting: https://github.com/codewars/codewars.com/wiki/Markdown-Formatting#block-code-formatting

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Turim
    • commented on "Snail" kata
    • 5 years ago

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Turim
    • commented on "Split Strings" cpp solution
    • 5 years ago

    time complexity isn't so obvious

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Turim
    • commented on "Split Strings" cpp solution
    • 5 years ago

    could have called reserve() on vector due to (s.size()+1 >> 1).
    can't figure it out also - is it clever, or misguided.
    this substr is nasty for if it extends the range, it won't segfault but returns valid/truncated data.

  • © 2025 Codewars
  • About
  • API
  • Blog
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact

Confirm

  • Cancel
  • Confirm

Collect: undefined

Loading collection data...