omg

God dang im dumb as a rock

easy way with f-string

я думал кароче код не сделать но автор этого кода всех нас переплюнул

smart

In Shell, the only interface to the user's code we get is through the function run_shell() in Ruby which runs in isolation and whatever variables or functions the user defined in their script no longer exist after it returns. I took a look at its source code and it's signature is :

def run_shell(script: $solution, file: nil, output: true, args: [])

so technically we could append some Shell code to $solution to check if there is a function greet defined but that's really working around the very limited framework for very little gain. This issue is almost impossible to resolve.

itertools is not necessary, otherwise a very clever solution! gratz

Now all languages have an initial code that compiles, with no assignment, and with the pattern toupper(string[0]); return string

It isn't, it's the full count. I didn't know about [your solution] (that it works with ints), but it's only different with 8 bits on x86, otherwise it compiles to the same thing.

isn't mod 2 redundant?

basic_op('; import os; os.system("ls") #', 1, 2)

They should ban workers from Bell Labs.

damn

This is incredible. I wrote a two-loop system, with special restrains and thought that was great, but yours... It's a dream.

Thanks... wondered if Python had something this!

of course it does