Ad
  • Custom User Avatar

    There is a problem with the test for SQL kata. The sequence in the kata description start from 0 but in the test (expected results) starts from 1.

    So in the description is P(0)=P(1)=P(2)=1

    but the expected result is P(1)=P(2)=P(3)=1

  • Custom User Avatar

    In the SQL version the description describes the sequence of pell numbers as 0-indexed, but the test expect it to be 1-indexed.

    In other words: The description states P(0) = 0, P(1) = 1, ..., but the tests expect P(1) = 0, P(2) = 1, ....

  • Custom User Avatar

    The pgsql client isn't properly parsing dollar quoted strings $$ $$

  • Default User Avatar

    is the use of gmpy2 banned or is my code just trippin?

  • Default User Avatar

    At least in Rust: missing a test with n = 0.

  • Custom User Avatar

    Numbers array seems to be sorted, but it's not specified in description.

  • Custom User Avatar
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "tests.py", line 1, in <module>
        from solution import *
      File "/workspace/default/solution.py", line 2, in <module>
        import numpy as np
      File "/workspace/default/preloaded.py", line 26, in DontDoThis
        Test.fail("Don't import {} or a module that depends on it.".format(name))
    NameError: name 'Test' is not defined
    
  • Custom User Avatar

    i wrote an O(n) solutions that saves the results in a global array so the the loop to find the next value starts from the last item in the array if it's not already in it. this algorithm only passes around 6 tests since the numbers are lines and lines of digits. any suggestions?

  • Default User Avatar

    I don't see a test case that covers this stipulation in the description: "Both elements of the pair must be unique".

    A test like this would do it:

    SumOfTwoSumTargets(new[] { 4, 6, 10 }, 6, 11);

    Where if you picked {4, 4} you'd end up with the wrong sum.

  • Default User Avatar

    I don't get why my very first and simpliest approach is not working.
    It fails at 1.000.000 final test.
    If i put 1.000.000 on sample test by my own, it pass the test, but not yours.
    --> assertEquals(new BigInteger("3944199426501073095"),Padovan.Get(1000000)) on sample pass the test, on yours i get an gooooogle number.
    I think i'm missing something important, but can't see it.

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution