thx man
No, JavaScript's interpreter understands both cases with the same way, it's a little bit styled.
is there a reason to put it in bracets?
Negative Zero Kata
of course it's this simple and of course I had to complicate it haha well done
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
I also solved this problem by using the split method to make it more easy for me for solving
man. someone else always came up with such elegant solutions.
Nice!
It's clever for sure. But usually clever != best practice.
Ohhhh, thanks, nice explanation
If you pass 0 to the function, it will return -0 yes, but when you try to display -0 (for example, with console.log(-0)), it will appear as 0. This is because JavaScript generally doesn't distinguish between 0 and -0 in the output.
you might think about, if the input have spaces in front. in that case this will throw ""
Loading collection data...
thx man
No, JavaScript's interpreter understands both cases with the same way, it's a little bit styled.
is there a reason to put it in bracets?
Negative Zero Kata
of course it's this simple and of course I had to complicate it haha well done
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
I also solved this problem by using the split method to make it more easy for me for solving
man. someone else always came up with such elegant solutions.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Nice!
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
It's clever for sure. But usually clever != best practice.
Ohhhh, thanks, nice explanation
If you pass 0 to the function, it will return -0 yes, but when you try to display -0 (for example, with console.log(-0)), it will appear as 0. This is because JavaScript generally doesn't distinguish between 0 and -0 in the output.
you might think about, if the input have spaces in front. in that case this will throw ""
Loading more items...