Honestly I have no idea why satisfaction rating for this kata is so low. Personally I liked it a lot, interesting and really good for the beginners.

Resolved with the approval of the latest fork.

Resolved with the approval of the latest fork.

Resolved!

I did find a bug in the error reporting code which may have confused you; sorry if so!

However, the actual pass/fail results of the random tests are correct and your solution is not. It was just the formatting of the error messages which was wrong; please try the following test case and observe that your function does not behave as it should:

describe("Another test", () => {
  const hole = [
      { val: '4', suit: 'Hearts' },
      { val: '6', suit: 'Hearts' }
  ];
  const flop = [
      { val: '6', suit: 'Spades' },
      { val: '9', suit: 'Spades' },
      { val: '6', suit: 'Clubs' },
  ];

  it('is a set', () => {
    assert.strictEqual(isSet(hole, flop), true);
  });
});

Issue resolved.

The random tests results are just as the tests... Random.
This is a waste of time for any Kyu level player.

I love card katas, and all the changes look extremely good and reasonable to me

These three classifications may overlap; for example, a hand with four-of-a-kind in it has a pair and a set, but not two pairs.

This nuance is especially something this kata description had to have

Approved

Substantial fork created, verging on a full rewrite; looking for review/approval.

https://www.codewars.com/kumite/6549b86f234c0d260c44be3f

Highlights:

• Node version => 18.x
• Test harness => Chai
• Shiny new description (better language, more accurate terminology, hopefully clearer and easier to read)
• Un-f***ed the random tests which seem to have resisted fixing for ~6 years.

I believe this addresses all open issues.

Still broken.

[ { val: '10', suit: 'Spades' }, { val: 'Ace', suit: 'Diamonds' } ] 
[ { val: '10', suit: 'Diamonds' }, { val: '10', suit: 'Hearts' }, { val: 'Jack', suit: 'Clubs' } ]

isSet(hand, flop) // => Expected: 'false', instead got: 'true'

Ok, will check

It is not resolved, I've tried it just now.

Failed at isSet:
[ '8_Spades', '7_Clubs', '7_Spades', '7_Hearts', '10_Spades' ]
Expected: 'false', instead got: 'true'

Resolved

Resolved

I find it very strange that you can have two identical cards in a deck of cards. Also, the random tests are not very good, they expect the wrong answer sometimes. I clicked on attempt a few times before it accepted my solution.

For isSet:

[ { val: '5', suit: 'Hearts' },
{ val: '10', suit: 'Diamonds' } ] [ { val: '3', suit: 'Hearts' },
{ val: '3', suit: 'Hearts' },
{ val: '3', suit: 'Clubs' } ]

Expected: 'true', instead got: 'false'

Why? Should be false.