• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
blr_Oliver Avatar
Name:Vasily
Clan:Unknown
Member Since:Mar 2015
Last Seen:Jul 2024
Profiles:
Following:1
Followers:1
Allies:0
View Profile Badges
  • Stats
  • Kata
  • Collections
  • Kumite
  • Social
  • Discourse
  • Conversations (95)
  • Replies
  • Authored
  • Needs Resolution
  • Custom User Avatar
    • o2001
    • resolved an issue on "Fraction to periodic decimal" kata
    • 6 months ago

    .

  • Custom User Avatar
    • o2001
    • resolved a suggestion on "Fraction to periodic decimal" kata
    • 6 months ago

    approved by someone

  • Custom User Avatar
    • o2001
    • commented on "Fraction to periodic decimal" kata
    • 6 months ago

    Fork published

  • Custom User Avatar
    • o2001
    • created a suggestion for "Fraction to periodic decimal" kata
    • 6 months ago

    Fork of eurydice5717's translation that resolves this issue caused by overflow. Each call to generate a random value now constructs its own int distribution, removing the arithmetic and guaranteeing that the numbers are in range.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • michael_wu
    • created an issue for "Fraction to periodic decimal" kata
    • 6 months ago

    C++ version. Contrary to the description, negative arguments are fed to the function.
    The expected results for negative fractions look strange:
    Incorrect result for fractionToPeriodic(-1689246217, 36291): Expected: equal to "-46547.(-2-4-90-9-7-5-7-2-400-...)"

  • Custom User Avatar
    • o2001
    • commented on "Fraction to periodic decimal" kata
    • 6 months ago

    Approved

  • Custom User Avatar
    • eurydice5717
    • commented on "Fraction to periodic decimal" kata
    • 6 months ago

    C++ translation waiting for comments or ... approval :-)

  • Custom User Avatar
    • lebraun
    • commented on "Multiples of 3 or 5" typescript solution
    • 10 months ago

    This is by far the most performant and elegant solution.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • blr_Oliver
    • commented on "Coding Meetup #7 - Higher-Order Functions Series - Find the most senior developer" javascript solution
    • 11 months ago

    Horrible solution. Perfect example of how to kill performance by making code shorter. Solutions here are expected to have O(n) and compete only in number of passes through the list, but this one manages to get to O(n^2).

  • Custom User Avatar
    • iguanaigi
    • commented on "Last digit of a huge number" kata
    • 12 months ago

    I don't think modular arithmetics is basic math, but I guess that is a matter of perceptioin.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • ejini战神
    • resolved a suggestion on "Primes in numbers" kata
    • 13 months ago

    That kata now already has a Java translation. Also this kata requires to merge the frequency count and prime factors in string format, so technically not an exact duplicate.

    Also, duplicates of Prime Factorization katas has been mentioned here and will be handled sooner or later.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • francisco.ls
    • commented on ""Sum of two lowest positive integers" Java Translation"
    • 13 months ago

    Corrected!
    Thanks for the feedback!

  • Custom User Avatar
    • blr_Oliver
    • commented on ""Sum of two lowest positive integers" Java Translation"
    • 13 months ago

    There is an issue for original kata and you better not inherit it. There really should be explicit tests with repeating minimum in the array. For example [3, 4, 3, 5] should produce 6, not 7. I guess, single fixed test is ok.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • blr_Oliver
    • commented on "Sum of two lowest positive integers" javascript solution
    • 13 months ago

    The solution is incorrect. It fails if the minimum element repeats anywhere in the array.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • hobovsky
    • commented on "Last digit of a huge number" kata
    • 15 months ago

    I dont know why Swift translator added it here, but other translators have not. Its been reported before too.

  • Loading more items...
  • © 2025 Codewars
  • About
  • API
  • Blog
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact

Confirm

  • Cancel
  • Confirm

Collect: undefined

Loading collection data...