• ###### Anuta Sienko commented on "String repeat" python solution

wOw, looks pretty

:o

• ###### geanscommented on "What's the real floor?" python solution

I like to see everything in one line. But it's not good practice.

Wow! xD

• ###### FedyakinRomancommented on "Hands Up" python solution

Holy moly, what i've done, it was so simple

• ###### Supergary21commented on "Hands Up" python solution

I think that n%3 mean that a number divide by 3 and what you want is the remainder. n//3%3 mean that you are diving the number dirst and rounding it down, then you are doinging another division and looking for it's remainder. Same with n//9%3 This just mean that you are dividing by 9 first and rounding down, then you divide by 3 and get the remainder.
For example;
5%3 would have a remainder of 2.
5//3%3 would be 1.66 and round down would have 1, then you find the remainder which is 1.
12//9%3 would be 1.33 and round down you get 1, then you find the remainder of 1/3 which is 1.

• ###### dhruvkcommented on "Hands Up" python solution

I mean how you are calculating the exact hands by dividing. I could think of three nested(one for each person ) for loops that gives me array of numbers, but I was failing to stop the 3 nested at exact hands given as input

• ###### mortonfoxcommented on "Hands Up" python solution

In the table given in the kata description, observe that P1, P2, P3 are simply counting in ternary. So this kata is an exercise in converting a decimal integer to ternary.

• ###### dhruvkcommented on "Hands Up" python solution

Can you please explain this solution

• ###### Rishat Nurievcommented on "Factorial Factory" python solution

This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

• ###### user7234276commented on "Consecutive items" python solution

This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

• ###### albertogcmrresolved an issue on "Doing Your Taxes" kata

Modified description.

• ###### staranuscommented on "Factorial Factory" python solution

I don't understand how's this solution covers the '0!' case in which is suppose to be equal to 1.

• ###### chutecommented on "Steffan153's fork of chute's C solution for "Complete Series"" kumite

Thanks for the correction, Steffan153