• Sign Up
  • Kata
  • Kumite
  • Forum
  • Wiki
  • Leaders
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
Name:Unknown
Clan:Unknown
Member Since:Oct 2014
Last Seen:Jan 2021
Profiles:
    Following:2
    Followers:30
    Allies:1
    View Profile Badges
    • Stats
    • Kata
    • Collections
    • Kumite
    • Social
    • Discourse
    • Conversations (639)
    • Replies
    • Authored
    • Needs Resolution
      • JohanWiltink
      • resolved a suggestion on "Limit string length - 1" kata

      Reraised as an Issue later.

      • GustavoHM
      • commented on "Credit Card Mask" javascript solution

      that's a good code

      • JohanWiltink
      • resolved an issue on "Maximum Contiguous Sum" kata

      Publication date is on the description page.

      This kata was first. Closing.

      • ejini战神
      • resolved an issue on "Trim a String" kata

      ADDED

      • iOz0ne
      • commented on "Mystery function #1" javascript solution

      WTF? How did you know about this?

      • Blind4Basics
      • resolved an issue on "esreveR" kata

      this is true, but too much specific to JS. Won't be added (especially now)

      • computerguy103
      • created a suggestion for "The builder of things" kata

      This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

      • computerguy103
      • created a suggestion for "The builder of things" kata

      This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

      • computerguy103
      • created an issue for "The builder of things" kata

      (JS)

      Since has, having, and with are synonyms, any of the following should be permitted, and should have the same result:

      jane.has(2).arms.each(arm => has(1).hand.having(5).fingers )
      jane.has(2).arms.each(arm => having(1).hand.having(5).fingers )
      jane.has(2).arms.each(arm => with(1).hand.having(5).fingers )
      

      As far as I can tell, only having is tested, and in fact with is a JS keyword so it's likely to cause problems for many solutions.

      • computerguy103
      • commented on "The builder of things" kata

      This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

      • macnick
      • commented on "Write JavaScript's 'call' function using apply." kata

      !

      • computerguy103
      • commented on "Functional SQL" kata

      The suggestion was to break it into several katas that gradually build up to this (I even gave examples of them, so it really shouldn't be confusing).

      But it's been 5 years since I suggested that, so you feel free to just not do it.

      • FArekkusu
      • resolved a suggestion on "Functional SQL" kata

      Not a suggestion. And any easier katas based on this idea would not be interesting/original.

      • FranklinG
      • commented on "Battleship field validator" javascript solution

      WoW! use Reg to solve this kata. cool

      • LiuSuY
      • commented on "Credit Card Mask" javascript solution

      厉害,一行搞定

    • Loading more items...
    • © 2021 Codewars
    • About
    • API
    • Blog
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Contact
    • powered by

    Confirm

    • Cancel
    • Confirm