Reraised as an Issue later.
Issue
that's a good code
Publication date is on the description page.
This kata was first. Closing.
ADDED
WTF? How did you know about this?
this is true, but too much specific to JS. Won't be added (especially now)
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
(JS)
Since has, having, and with are synonyms, any of the following should be permitted, and should have the same result:
has
having
with
jane.has(2).arms.each(arm => has(1).hand.having(5).fingers ) jane.has(2).arms.each(arm => having(1).hand.having(5).fingers ) jane.has(2).arms.each(arm => with(1).hand.having(5).fingers )
As far as I can tell, only having is tested, and in fact with is a JS keyword so it's likely to cause problems for many solutions.
!
The suggestion was to break it into several katas that gradually build up to this (I even gave examples of them, so it really shouldn't be confusing).
But it's been 5 years since I suggested that, so you feel free to just not do it.
Not a suggestion. And any easier katas based on this idea would not be interesting/original.
WoW! use Reg to solve this kata. cool
厉害,一行搞定
Reraised as an
Issue
later.that's a good code
Publication date is on the description page.
This kata was first. Closing.
ADDED
WTF? How did you know about this?
this is true, but too much specific to JS. Won't be added (especially now)
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
(JS)
Since
has
,having
, andwith
are synonyms, any of the following should be permitted, and should have the same result:As far as I can tell, only
having
is tested, and in factwith
is a JS keyword so it's likely to cause problems for many solutions.This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
!
The suggestion was to break it into several katas that gradually build up to this (I even gave examples of them, so it really shouldn't be confusing).
But it's been 5 years since I suggested that, so you feel free to just not do it.
Not a suggestion. And any easier katas based on this idea would not be interesting/original.
WoW! use Reg to solve this kata. cool
厉害,一行搞定
Loading more items...