Did you try it? From time to time I remind people to return to their katas

I thihnk it would be better to test all the numbers: all positive and all negative shuffled. Thus getting rid of random test at all.

Approved.

fork addressing Voile's points below (author inactive)

• chai assertions
• no more hijacking of the Date object
• no more busy wait
• no more hidden preloaded code
• tests use the asynchronous tests feature from mocha
• better example code in the description
• the original author's solution still passes the tests

• also the case for Javascript
• the sample tests in these languages should be hardcoded examples instead of what we have now

I did the same. I like it

when you return you don't need to add the break couse you already breaking the code

[not a kata issue]

your code fails a fixed test, here is the error message:

'Should handle negative numbers. For input n = -13, m = -13: expected NaN to equal +0'

which means your code returned NaN for that test. then your code fails any similar test during the random tests

so, you need to rework your code to handle negative numbers

JavaScript: Passed all tests but, after clicking Attempt it shows another 2 tests that are not passed

python new test framework

Good practice for Python

For such a short string is not something to bother about, and it feels cleaner for this specific problem

exactly my thoughts!

Appears to be the case in Python at least.