nicely done

 too bad there is no publication date
 2014

• Intial solution has a promblem
• need more tests
• not solvable for new students
• Other ways to solve if the individual knows how to program

• Love this idea
• Need more tests
• The description is nice and clean
• It allows for students to learn new concepts

• Needs more random tests
• I love the description and concept

Variables should not be capitalized, as they are not classes.

The tests does not match the description:

function point([0,0], [3,0], 2){

}
This should return [2,0]

But for point([0,0],[1,0],2) You expect [1/3, 0].

--Creative detailed Kata, description is very clear and understandable
--I would probably add an extra line of the given start-up solution to lead new students on the right path to an answer
--Needs more added random tests

--Kata is very creative & different
--Add more random tests
-- Use of string manipulation is good and solvable for new ASC students

--Description clear
--Solvable for new ASC students
--Add more test cases -- kata can be solved an unintentional way

--The description is very informal and fun to read -- leading to new coders to understand the problem and actively try
--I didn’t identity any unintentional ways to solve the problem
--The addition of strings could've been intoduced more smoothly
--More tests are needed

--Description is easy to read and understandable
-- Relatively solvable for new ASC students
-- I would provide more tests to damper unintentional solutions for your test case

--The TDD and the given solution output seems a little more advanced and I can see it being hard to understand for new ASC students
--The features used to classify the human object such as walk/add can be replace with a better feature that would help ASC understand it more
--More sample cases

• Needs more tests