• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
dsomething Avatar
Name:Unknown
Clan:Unknown
Member Since:May 2019
Last Seen:Nov 2019
Profiles:
    Following:31
    Followers:6
    Allies:1
    View Profile Badges
    • Stats
    • Kata
    • Collections
    • Kumite
    • Social
    • Discourse
    • Conversations (88)
    • Replies
    • Authored
    • Needs Resolution
    • Custom User Avatar
      • SOLVM
      • commented on "Sum of two lowest positive integers" elixir solution
      • 2 months ago

      sweet

    • Custom User Avatar
      • SOLVM
      • commented on "Sum Arrays" elixir solution
      • 6 months ago

      avoid the default param in this public call as it could result in the function being called with an unintended accumulator value

    • Custom User Avatar
      • urawsm
      • commented on "Collatz Conjecture (3n+1)" elixir solution
      • 2 years ago

      This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

    • Custom User Avatar
      • fireindark707
      • commented on "Deodorant Evaporator" elixir solution
      • 2 years ago

      Thanks, it makes sense.

    • Custom User Avatar
      • evanrh
      • commented on "Deodorant Evaporator" elixir solution
      • 2 years ago

      This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

    • Custom User Avatar
      • bgandhi
      • commented on "Convert string to camel case" elixir solution
      • 3 years ago

      sweet

    • Custom User Avatar
      • bgandhi
      • commented on "The Poet And The Pendulum" elixir solution
      • 3 years ago

      respect!

    • Custom User Avatar
      • glycerate
      • commented on "Sum of positive" elixir solution
      • 3 years ago

      I agree

    • Custom User Avatar
      • glycerate
      • commented on "Sum of positive" elixir solution
      • 3 years ago

      Cool use of guards!

    • Custom User Avatar
      • glycerate
      • commented on "Sum of two lowest positive integers" elixir solution
      • 3 years ago

      Nice one

    • Custom User Avatar
      • m3doune
      • commented on "Sum of positive" elixir solution
      • 4 years ago

      more clean I think than using combination of filter/sum
      Here you've just travel the list one time

    • Custom User Avatar
      • MobulaKuhlii
      • commented on "Coordinates Validator" elixir solution
      • 5 years ago

      It wouldn't, but something like 51., 122. would, also capturing groups when they're not used.

    • Custom User Avatar
      • kelsonpw
      • commented on "Sum Arrays" elixir solution
      • 6 years ago

      nice tail call optimization

    • Custom User Avatar
      • breaddevil
      • commented on "Coordinates Validator" elixir solution
      • 6 years ago

      It looks like it would incorrectly return true for most integer, "1000000, 1000000" for example.

    • Custom User Avatar
      • dsomething
      • commented on "Are You Playing Banjo?" elixir solution
      • 6 years ago

      This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

    • Loading more items...
    • © 2025 Codewars
    • About
    • API
    • Blog
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Code of Conduct
    • Contact

    Confirm

    • Cancel
    • Confirm

    Collect: undefined

    Loading collection data...