• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
extrn Avatar
Name:Unknown
Clan:Unknown
Member Since:Nov 2018
Last Seen:Mar 2025
Profiles:
Following:1
Followers:2
Allies:1
View Profile Badges
  • Stats
  • Kata
  • Collections
  • Kumite
  • Social
  • Discourse
  • Conversations
  • Replies
  • Authored (3)
  • Needs Resolution
  • Custom User Avatar
    • extrn
    • created a suggestion for "Hamming Numbers" kata
    • 4 years ago

    The test cases in Haskell are wery weak. Consider using

    forAll (choose (1, length hams)) $ \x -> ...
    

    instead of

    property $ \x -> x > 5000 || x < 1 || ...
    
  • Custom User Avatar
    • extrn
    • commented on "Stringy Strings" haskell solution
    • 5 years ago

    It's not about size. In point-free version cycle "10" will most likely be evaluated only once (even if you don't really need it in this case)

  • Custom User Avatar
    • extrn
    • commented on "Word Segmentation" haskell solution
    • 5 years ago

    Thanks :)
    Applicative/Monadic parsers are really great.

  • © 2025 Codewars
  • About
  • API
  • Blog
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact

Confirm

  • Cancel
  • Confirm

Collect: undefined

Loading collection data...