That is correct. This solution functions correctly only because of the constraints specified. If the initial value is 10 then no matter what I do, my opponent can force me to lose the game, so I know that I will never recieve 10 as an input.
@SnickersTheCat, you are right, but the description specifies but you have a friend in judging who has excluded all hopeless initial l values for you, so a losing value will not be tested.
It's about the diagonals (complete ones and partials ones). A very good explanation was made by benjaminzwhite in his python solution of the kata, I can't do better. ;)
Nice, but what if input is 11, or 12 etc?
good!
That is correct. This solution functions correctly only because of the constraints specified. If the initial value is 10 then no matter what I do, my opponent can force me to lose the game, so I know that I will never recieve 10 as an input.
@SnickersTheCat, you are right, but the description specifies
but you have a friend in judging who has excluded all hopeless initial l values for you, so a losing value will not be tested.does this return 0 as a value which would be out of range?
when I pass 10 as length it is retuurning 0 which I would think would be outside of the allowed test values
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
In case of INT/INT division - fractional part is being truncated.
How can the solution be just that lol
It's about the diagonals (complete ones and partials ones). A very good explanation was made by benjaminzwhite in his python solution of the kata, I can't do better. ;)
Sorry for the question, but I can't understand the 2a(a-1)(3b-a-1)/3 and the corrispective 2b(b-1)(3a-b-1)/3.
I want an explanation, please.
Duplicate of https://www.codewars.com/kata/55905b7597175ffc1a00005a ? (Just a difference of performance?)
Same idea with mine.
Thank you for this! I altered it from recurrence_rate to recurrence but missed that spot.
corrected
Solution corrected thanks for picking this up
the function name in the initial code is
recurrence_ratebut the tests expect it to be namedrecurrenceLoading more items...