Please, review and approve/reject. The sooner is better, because C++ version of this kata is in really bad condition, I don't understand how it was able to pass the review.
Maybe it should be specified that p/36000 is NOT the right way of going from an annual interest to a daily interest.
That indeed, it is a simplification to make the kata easier.
Would someone care to explain what this comment means? Thanks in advance.
C++ fork to fix this issue
Please, review and approve/reject. The sooner is better, because C++ version of this kata is in really bad condition, I don't understand how it was able to pass the review.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
C++:
#include
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
these fields not needed in setup
has been approved
OP solved it, closing
Agree
I'll leave a label for myself - this is an interesting solution))
Fixed. Thank you
In reference solution
if i > ...
should beif i >= ...
.Maybe it should be specified that p/36000 is NOT the right way of going from an annual interest to a daily interest.
That indeed, it is a simplification to make the kata easier.
it didn't work for me either
great point
The C and C++ test fixtures have warnings.
Loading more items...