Enabled in this fork

i want cry because my c++ teacher always make Eva and Adam Variables and name of structures or classes! THIS IS BETTER FOR ME ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

Description should be more clear.

I agree with you 100%

Groovy Translation

This description was beyond confusing!

This is how it should be written:

1. Create a Base-Class/Parent Prototype and name it Human with attribute of name.

2. Create Two Child Prototypes/Subclasses from your base class Human, using inheritance. Rename your new Child Prototypes/Subclasses; Man and Woman.

3. Define an object named God with a method named, create. Within the create method, instantiate new objects of Man and Woman using
   your inherited Classes. Within your God object, return an array with a length of 2, containing your newly created Man and Woman.

4. Alternatively, you may add to the original God class and redefine the create method.

Considering the categorization as 8 kyu and we cannot change the difficulty, it is safe to assume beginner's have no experience creating objects or are familiar with OOP principles.

Therefore, it is important to discuss more important discription info here because of such an incomprehensible design by the author.

Probably the worst one for me.

Ruby: no random tests

Yall are lame due to the lack of labia

i agree, i really dont know what to do

Nobody's playing the role of anything. This is a little program on a coding website. Get a grip.

this is a ethical issue

This is not a kata issue.