Having some experience commiting to back-end and middle-end of certain popular programming language compilers - it's not always so simple. The length of the code doesn't necessarily map to the length of machine code. It's a good rule of thumb, but it might not apply in this case.

These loops are idiomatic and easy to identify by SSA optimization rules.

There's a comment somewhere here that says it's the fastest solution. I haven't really built it with that in mind, but if it is, I bet it's because it's easy for the runtime/compiler to apply optimizations and vectorize the loops.

Just looking at them they seem ripe for some optimized SIMD bit magic implementation.

It's to simulate the API's of existing real-world HTTP routers. In the end, a router is returning a string to a HTTP server.

Same solution

don't understand the point of this kata. why are you passing simple text as lambda functions? is this ever a useful technique? Doesn't need sorted, filter, map, reduce at all if the lambda is just text like 'hello world'

Hi,

In english, please (use an automatic translator if needed).

Cheers

не позорься, там тесты слишком легкие, поэтому

;-;

I don't think it's over documented, although certainly it could be shorter.
That can also imply less perf

For js "photoManager.nameExists(res)" is always true.

This should be a 5 kyu or 6 kyu

Closing since it seems to be resolved whereby the fork is approved

Approved by someone

Approved some time agooo

This code would be better for a BE/Java developer rather than a JS one, kudos anyway, even if it's a bit verbose to me